[Note from Frolic: We’re so excited to welcome author Signe Pike to the site today! She’s talking all things King Arthur. Take it away, Signe!]
The first step is admitting you have a problem, so here it is.
I am addicted to Long Ago and Far Away.
If you suffer a similar affliction, you know exactly what I mean. It’s an addiction to the past, to a time we can nearly touch but not quite remember, a time without the ping of text messages and the jolting blare of a telephone. Long Ago and Far Away is a time and place where buildings were made of rock or timber and travel was done by horse, by boat or most often, by foot. It was not a place where plastic piled up, choking our animals and our oceans. Instead, there was a different relationship to the earth; one of respect, subsistence and gratitude for the survival it provided. But the pining for this lost world becomes all the more acute when one recognizes the most difficult truth: I’m not speaking of some imaginary place. The place I’ve become addicted to is part of our very real human history. Early medieval Scotland.
In my fondness, I’ve painted an inaccurately rosy portrait here. Those centuries were hard living, full of violence, upheaval, and bloodshed. Nonetheless, the list of things that involuntarily rocket my heart rate include: horses galloping through fields of heather, brooding skies over mountains, wooden boats, grim-faced warriors (usually honor bound), mist, sea wind, huts in the forest, stone circles, ancient jewelry, hand-woven textiles and yes, even man buns. This makes me a real sucker for a wide variety of movies and television shows that touch these elements and bring them to life, whether they be straight historical or fantasy. Game of Thrones, for example, may be set in another world, but it possesses more than a touch of the medieval about it. Delicious. Outlander may be over one thousand years too “late,” but it ticks so many of the boxes. Vikings! Sweet heavens. So much there to love. But when it comes to the Arthurian legend, a tale born of the very days I would teleport myself to if given half the chance, nothing hits the mark.
Merlin and Camelot. The 2004 film King Arthur. The Mists of Avalon miniseries, based on one of my all-time favorite books. Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur, Legend of the Sword. And now, even the erful feminine retelling, Cursed, based on the YA cult novel of the same name. The list goes on, but despite my anticipation, the results are the same. They are either too flat or too fantastical. Discordantly modern, poorly produced, poorly cast, or poorly written. Sometimes they’re all of these things thrown together in one disappointing visual assault I will never quite manage to un-see.
“Why is Hollywood so obsessed with King Arthur?” recent headline in The Independent lamented. Forbes agreed. “Hollywood Needs To Stop Making Robin Hood, King Arthur And Peter Pan Movies,” contributor Scott Mendelson wrote. “Excalibur was barely a hit in 1981 ($34 million domestic on an $11 million budget), but Quest For Camelot, First Knight, King Arthur, Legend of the Sword and The King Who Would Be King were absolutely not. The only real blockbuster King Arthur movie we’ve had was, by default, Aquaman.”
Why, why why? I’ve asked time and time again as I reached dejectedly for the remote. The story has all the elements we yearn for – heroism, natural enchantment, bravery, loss, love and betrayal. It was only in studying the real roots of the legend that I think I’ve discovered what all of these adaptations have been missing.
Truth.
“Write one true sentence,” Earnest Hemingway once said. “Write the truest sentence that you know.” Hemingway knew the magical formula. In order for humans to feel connected, there has to be an element of truth, a realness we can recognize, one that thrums in our chests with the resonance of a tuning fork. And this is the crux of it. The “truth” of all these Arthurian stories is missing. No, not missing. It’s been lost, lost and robbed by centuries of misappropriation, beginning with Geoffrey of Monmouth and Thomas Malory and ending with so many of the works we find splashed across our television screens today. The elements of story are there, but the beating heart is missing. It wasn’t until I came across new and convincing scholarship into the legend of Arthur and Merlin that I understood this.
In recent years, a collection of new non-fiction books have come out that are helping those of us in search of something more real understand the true magnificence of the Arthurian legend. Adam Ardrey, Nikolai Tolstoy, Robin Crichton and early medieval historian Tim Clarkson have all published books on the real historical figures they believe inspired the legends of Arthur and his “magical” counsellor Merlin. Arthur was a Scottish warlord, and Merlin, a warrior and politician with nary a hint of magic shooting from his fingertips.
The more I read, the more I became ravenous for it. I read everything I could get my hands on. I read for years and years. The rabbit hole of my own research lead me into hagiographies of saints and ancient annuls. To king lists and 6th century fragments of poetry – memories of events in lives long forgotten. And the more I read, the more connected I felt to these lost people, as fragile and human as you or I, and no more or less magical, each in their own way.
Tell me more, I thought, absently pushing away the TV remote. Tell me something true. My addiction, I realized, was more accurately a sense of passion. I felt the longing to rediscover something more real, something that could truly make me feel. So I turned away from things that no longer felt true.
And I set out to create something different.